The Watch Site banner

The 7017-6050 Rally Meter, the “Eyeless Rally”

26K views 41 replies 18 participants last post by  maxbrux  
#1 · (Edited)
The 7017-6050 Rally Meter, the “Eyeless Rally”
Image

EXACTLY What’s an Auto Rally?
Strictly speaking, a rally (also called time-speed-distance or TSD) is a timed motorsport that mostly takes place on public roads.

Image


Rallys aren’t just about speed. The cars are running against the clock rather than head to head.

Image


Rally racing typically features driving over long distances on ordinary roads, facing hazards such as traffic, pedestrians and farm animals.

Image


While still held today, rally racing was at its height of popularity in the late 1960s and early 70s.

Image


Each driver is accompanied by a navigator who calculates the time and speed. The rally winner is determined by whichever driver adheres closest to the predetermined ideal “journey time”. So keeping track of your speed and distance is paramount.

Image


In order for the navigators to manage to maintain the driver’s speed and rhythm within the “regular” speeds imposed on them, they felt the need for instruments beyond what came installed from the factory. It must be remembered that the 60s’ and 70s was still an analogue world. The only extra instrumentation most rally participants had might have been a stopwatch and clock mounted on the dash

Image


and maybe a dual-display odometer.

Image


Image


If you Google the term “rally meter” today, you will run into a range of digital instruments from smartphone apps, all the way to computers designed to be directly hard-wired into your car’s electrical system.

Image


But the first, purpose built rally meter that there is evidence for is the the Seiko 7017-6050 “Rally Meter” watch, introduced in 1970.

Suwa vs. Daini

Image


During the 1960s’ and 70s’ Seiko’s Suwa Seikosha factory and the Daini Seikosha factory were run as separate entities in order to promote competition and spark innovation within Seiko. Having Suwa and Daini operating as almost separate companies meant that they had their own independent engineering and design departments. Thus each of the two divisions engineered its own unique movements as well cultivated its own styling.


In 1969 Suwa announced a triumph with the introduction of the 6139, the first commercially available automatic chronograph.



Well, if Daini couldn’t beat its rival at being the first out the gate with an automatic chronograph, maybe they could produce the thinnest automatic chronograph movement ever made.

Image


In 1970, Daini introduced the 7017 chronograph movement. With a thickness of just 5.9 mm, the 7017 set a world record for the thinnest chronograph movement.

But to achieve the movement’s record-breaking slimness, the designers at Daini had to leave out all the cool looking sub-dials and registers like the ones found on the 6139 and 6138. What could Daini offer in the place of those attractive sub-dials and registers?

Image


All of Suwa’s 6139 and 6138 chronographs sported a standard (but stationary) tachymeter ring. So one way for Daini to distinguish itself was for their 7019s to feature moveable dial rings that could perform functions unavailable on the 6139.

The 7017-6050 “Rally Meter”

Image


By 1970 tachymeters were nothing special, all chronographs had them since the start of the century. What would differentiate the 7017-6050 was the addition of the internal "Rally Meter" slide rule bezel.

Image


The 7017-6050 Rally Meter has only one logarithmic scale that rotates around the fixed scale on the dial. Its ONLY function is to calculate the speed and distance traveled during a regularity rally.

Most other slide rule bezels have a confusing array of multiple scales for calculating everything from fuel consumption, air speed and distance, sine, cosine and tangent, to how much to tip the waiter.

Image


This spartan markings of the 7017-6050’s slide rule are in strong contrast to the complicated scales found on the majority of slide rule bezels out there.

Image


Directions
I had a very hard time trying to understand the original 7017-6050 Rally Meter instructions before I realized that it wasn’t me. It's just a very awkward 50 year-old Japanese to English translation.

Here's the original:



I carefully read over the brochure, and using my 25 years of experience as a high school and middle school English teacher, came up with what I hope is a more sensible English construction.

This is my reconstruction:

Image


The Bracelet
I usually argue that for the Seiko’s of this era, the bracelet is half the point. And while the bracelet is indeed unique to this watch, I have to confess that there is nothing about it that particularly compliments the case.

Image


The 7017-6050 Rally Meter would look just as good (if not better) on any number of appropriate “rally” straps as it does on its original bracelet.

The Knock Offs
Imitation is the highest form of flattery, and within a year of launching the 7017-6050 Rally Meter in 1970, two other competitors released watches with similar slide rule bezels designed only to calculate the speed and distance traveled in an automobile. There was the almost identical Citizen Rally Custom, launched about a year after Seiko's Rally Meter, and Swiss Camy Rally King, which came out two years later in 1972.

Image


“The Eyeless Rally”
Among collectors in Japan the 7017-6950 Rally Meter has earned the nickname of “the Eyeless Rally” (「目なしラリー」) for its lack of sub-dials.

Image


In today’s world of computers and smartphones, few of us really knows, or really wants to know how a slide rule bezel works.

Image

A 1970 7017-6050 beside a 7015-7010 from 1972, which features the same "Rally Timer" slide rule bezel.

Even the workings of the simplified 7017-6050 slide rule bezel will elude most of us, rendering its purpose as largely ornamental. But hey, it still looks pretty cool!

Image
 
#6 ·
Great write up and review!
 
#8 ·
My very own 7017-6050 came in the mail today. It has it's original bracelet, and it's long enough to fit comfortably around my wrist.

Usually having the original bracelet, if not a prerequisite, is a bonus. But not this time.



The endpieces are rough, and the links are well worn. Moreover, it doesn't really contribute anything to the styling. The catalogs actually show it on an H-link, which looks at least as good as the one it's on. I think I'll give that a try and put the original away for now.

It's working fine, but i'm still going to have it serviced and put in a new rotating ring that I have coming.

Image
 
#11 ·
SH - outstanding, and I mean outstanding work. I did some "civilized" TSD (meaning only on paved roads) while at university in the 1980s. One of my big attractions to my turbo Subarus (e.g. the WRX) is that company's long legacy of Ralley competition. It makes for one wicked street car, especially in the northern part of the US (although I would argue that I'm mid-Atlantic). :)

I have copied your revised instruction set - thank you!

Perhaps my second favorite Seiko chrono is the 7017 series. I'm going to try to see if I can work my -6020 in this way. This also explains the need for the flyback function of the 7017s.
 

Attachments

#16 ·
Some recent observations:

The internal rotating bezel of the 7017-6050 comes in two variants.

The most common variant is missing the number 10, and has a luminous pip in its place (see first three pictures).

The other less common variant has the number 10 and has no luminous pip (see last picture).

Image


The 7017-6050 dial also comes in two variants.

Image
 
#21 ·
Just today bought a 7017-6020 off the bay. Cannot wait for it to arrive.
Awesome, post some pictures!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
#34 ·
Some of my favorites here. I have the -6050 and -6020. Don’t forget the very similar 7015-7010 which may be my favorite of the three.
Image



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grammarofdesign
#35 ·
Image

Image




Hi

My 7017-6050 was stolen as part of a major burglary at home whilst we were on hols last month in which 90% of my collection disappeared 😥😥😥. All that’s left are the ones that were with me on holiday, a dozen or so that were with watchmakers having work done, and a few that were in transit from Japan. One of those was this 7017-6020. I was wearing it all day today to ‘test-drive‘ it whilst also looking up other examples online on a ‘compare and contrast’ basis. It runs very well indeed.

My first conclusion when it arrived and I did some preliminary snooping online was that the watch is not authentic. I was worried about the outer bezel, dial and caseback. They didn’t seem to match the vast majority of examples I found online. Having done some more research, I have arrived at the following hypothesis, and I’d appreciate any input to either refute or corroborate my findings ( where I’m still very unsure about my suppositions, I have marked it with a ??):

The 7017-6020 was produced for only a short period of time, probably from around mid-1970 to late ‘71??
There were two variants.
Early watches have the dial reference 7017-6020R ( same ref as on the 6050) and are ‘proof’ dials. They have an outer bezel in black, with a tachometer scale from 1000 to 60.
Again like the 7017-6050 reference, later versions of the 7017-6020 from mid ‘71 onwards have a different ‘no text’ dial with the reference 7017-6060R and a different outer bezel. It is two-tone black and red and has a tachymeter scale that runs from 120 to 41. This is the same bezel that is found on the later incarnations of the 6050??
Unusually, the later ‘no text’ version of the 6020 is significantly rarer than the ‘proof version’??

As regards my own example, I now believe it to be a genuine example of a later ‘no text’ version of the 6020, whose correct outer bezel has faded and lost its red colouring. Which makes me wonder whether the bracelet that it came on is also authentic and correct for this particular watch - anybody out there got a 6020 ‘no text’ example with what is known to be its original bracelet?