The Watch Site banner
21 - 40 of 56 Posts
Discussion starter · #26 ·
Hi VmaxNL,

to be transparent: I'm the dealer who sold the watch that you claim is fake to a customer.

Therefore, I have some questions regarding your claims:
1. How do you know that the seahorse caseback was discontinued in December 1966? Any catalogues, ads, or archive information?
2. When you look at old catalogues (e.g. here https://d2f0ora2gkri0g.cloudfront.net/93/60/93607c34-5449-467c-a488-c073a706a682.png) the print looks more like the one on the "fake" than your "original".

My feeling is that you are jumping to conclusions too fast only because of small deviations.
Who would invest in such a good "fake" (laser engraving,...) for a 650€ watch in such small quantities?
I have some experience with Lord Marvels and would say that the watch is perfectly fine, even a very good example.

But I'm definitely happy to change my mind if you can convince me otherwise.

Best,
Sebastian
When I am wrong, I am wrong, and I stand for it. I will explain...

I got some data from Dapellegrini, which made me curious. He got some serious data on Bell-Matics and WorldTimers, and pointed out some details, that would change my point of view.

I did some more research, and Dapellegrini did have a good point. The Suwa logo's can differ and the logo on the watch you sold, is correct. To read more about his findings about the Suwa logo:
Bell Matics document
At my research I found other, similar diamond shaped Suwa logo's on early High-Beat Lord Marvels. But they had all something common, on which I will come back later.

And about the caseback, he had another good point. The difference in the relief of the stamping of the caseback. Dan collected about 200 pictures of casebacks of WorldTimers and 5717/19 monopushers. On these pictures you can easily see, the relief changes with the production runs, as Dan also suggests. If that can be the case with the Lord Marvel also, then your caseback is legit.
I searched about 40 Seahorse casebacks online, even compared to mine Low-Beats, and came to the same conclusion. Seiko stopped producing the Seahorse caseback in december 1966, but it took probably some time to use them up. And as I did not find anything beyond May 1967, that may have been the limit for the Seahorse caseback. Please prove me wrong, when someone finds a June 1967 Seahorse caseback.
Where I went wrong, was when I saw an fake a while ago, that actually had a lasered caseback. But it was very rough, caused by the burning of the laser. The fonts were not very sharp and not in the right shape. The watch you sold, it is smooth and correct.

So I salute for accusing you for selling a fake watch, that is 100% legit. My apologies!

I will correct the starting posts as soon as possible (it's now about 0:40AM, a bit to late to correct it all, but I'll do my best!

And as I said in the starting post: I don't have all the wisdom! I've learned from this discussion and will continue to learn!

Sincerly,

Patrick
 
I'll share the context here publicly. Also, these are just my opinions, based on a lot of data gathering and studying, and great feedback from others.

First on the evolution of the Suwa logo, at least in the Bellmatics:
I was surprised when I first realized this, and initially thought the earlier versions must be fakes, but they are legit, and tie off to specific production date ranges:


And, more on that is also in the Appendix of the full Google Doc:

And if you like data - you can see the full data sets especially for the 4006-7000, 4006-7010 and 4006-7020, here:

And on the case backs, my current theory is that the stamp or die or whatever was used to mark these case backs (especially the olympic torch, the seahorse and some of the dolphins) would wear out and get replaced at various points in a production run - so you will see some case backs with a nice 3D / high relief stamping, and over the next several thousand case backs it gets more and more faint until it has a high tendency to wear right off, then we again will see nice deep stamped versions, which again wear down over the production counters / months.

Dataset of World Timers from 1964 here:
Click the toggle to view the case backs instead of the dials, they are in production order

And here are the 5719 and 5717 case backs (not as many collected yet):
 
When I am wrong, I am wrong, and I stand for it. I will explain...

I got some data from Dapellegrini, which made me curious. He got some serious data on Bell-Matics and WorldTimers, and pointed out some details, that would change my point of view.

I did some more research, and Dapellegrini did have a good point. The Suwa logo's can differ and the logo on the watch you sold, is correct. To read more about his findings about the Suwa logo:
Bell Matics document
At my research I found other, similar diamond shaped Suwa logo's on early High-Beat Lord Marvels. But they had all something common, on which I will come back later.

And about the caseback, he had another good point. The difference in the relief of the stamping of the caseback. Dan collected about 200 pictures of casebacks of WorldTimers and 5717/19 monopushers. On these pictures you can easily see, the relief changes with the production runs, as Dan also suggests. If that can be the case with the Lord Marvel also, then your caseback is legit.
I searched about 40 Seahorse casebacks online, even compared to mine Low-Beats, and came to the same conclusion. Seiko stopped producing the Seahorse caseback in december 1966, but it took probably some time to use them up. And as I did not find anything beyond May 1967, that may have been the limit for the Seahorse caseback. Please prove me wrong, when someone finds a June 1967 Seahorse caseback.
Where I went wrong, was when I saw an fake a while ago, that actually had a lasered caseback. But it was very rough, caused by the burning of the laser. The fonts were not very sharp and not in the right shape. The watch you sold, it is smooth and correct.

So I salute for accusing you for selling a fake watch, that is 100% legit. My apologies!

I will correct the starting posts as soon as possible (it's now about 0:40AM, a bit to late to correct it all, but I'll do my best!

And as I said in the starting post: I don't have all the wisdom! I've learned from this discussion and will continue to learn!

Sincerly,

Patrick
Hi Patrick,

thank you for your apologies and further research. In the end, we all learned more about this reference.
Dapellegrini's research is very impressive, almost insane :)

All the best for the coming year!

Best regards,
Sebastian
 
Discussion starter · #29 ·
We continue the story of the Lord Marvel. We leave the 5740 series and go to the first Lord Marvel, the Mark I to V. A nice list about these watches is found at Special dial. That article is pretty complete, so I won't repeat it here. Instead I will post my Lord Marvel 15027E. I would have wished, Seiko would keep the finishing of the movement in the 5740-series, as the finishing is much nicer! I do also like the caseback with the engraving.
Image
Image

Image


But when we mention the 1st generation of the Lord Marvel, you got to mention also the Seiko Crown. It's movement (Seiko 560 movement) was the basement, were the famous 5740 movement was build on. They came in a great variety of dials, this one is a J15003E. Nice watches, that can be bought for low prices.
Image
Image
 
Big thank you to the initiator and contributors to this thread. Not only is it very informative, in my view it also exemplifies the value of weighing arguments and learning from each other (which is why I’m here in the first place).

Have a peaceful new year 😊

Klaus
 
Discussion starter · #31 · (Edited)
And then of course the Seiko Marvel and the Seiko Laurel. Why? Without the Laurel, there would have never been a Lord Marvel. And the Seiko Marvel gave the name to the Lord Marvel. And so on... (it goes back to the Seiko Unique and the Seiko Super...)
So a few pictures of them also...

Seiko Marvel (1957)
Image
Image


Seiko Laurel (1960)
Image
Image


Seiko Unique (1958)
Image
Image


Seiko Super (1958)
Image
Image


Seiko Super (1955)
Image
Image


These are watches out of my own collection.
 
Discussion starter · #32 ·
At last, the automatics. The Gyro Marvel... They carry the name, but don't really belong to these handwinders, although they can be handwind...
These were the first movement of Seiko to use the Magic Fingers, which Seiko became famous for. A simple and functional system for winding the main spring.
Image
 
I wanted to say "thank you" to all involved in this discussion - it has been very informative, thoughtful and very civil, even when there was an argument. It is great to see that there can be grown-ups on the internet, after all ;)

May 2024 be a great year for all of us.

... still downloading that Bellmatic document, I am beyond impressed and may have already found a "New Year's resolution" in this :cool:
 
I've been thinking I need a Lord Marvel to add to my collection but I never imagined there were fakes out there. This is very helpful. Thanks everyone for contributing to this useful document. Just a question. Where does the early Seiko hand wind Cronos fit into evolution of the Lord Marvel?
 
I'm reviving this thread because I think its relevant to the larger discussion: I have been looking at the low beat lord marvels as of recent. I finished a (pre-lord) Marvel, 50s watch J14033 , the lowly 17J version and am now on the lookout for another pre-modern Seiko. I came across the attached recently and I did not realize this line had a carved logo? is that correct? I was under the impression that only the Grand Seiko first had a carved logo?

Thanks for taking a look!

Image
 
Seiko was not the only one carving the logo on the dial, Citizen did it too.
This one is underway to me...
wow, that parawater is really cool. I'm guessing early screw back, maybe ring type? I've also been looking for citizen ace, I just discovered how cool some of the early citizen are. I have restored a handful of leopards but nothing earlier.

currently how much do you think is too much for a out of service, gold fill marvel low beat like the 23J I posted? Or at least range - I'm trying to get a sense. It also seems like a lot of the gold fill have the etching polished out on the caseback.
 
Discussion starter · #40 ·
wow, that parawater is really cool. I'm guessing early screw back, maybe ring type?
Sadly there was no picture of the case back. But I've got another Parawater, same model, a bit different dial, coming in. And it appears to me, it was some sort of snap on case. Maybe some sort of compressor-case? I'll have to wait and see...
Image
Image
Image
 
21 - 40 of 56 Posts