The Watch Site banner

Best well-made Seiko movement.

5K views 30 replies 13 participants last post by  balance  
#1 ·
Ok, I am definitely underwhelmed by the Seiko 8L family. Some people equated the quality to Rolex. I don't even know where to begin on that one.:unsure: I found it to be pedestrian at best, and that is me having a positive attitude.

So, is there any movement vintage or current that Seiko (or Grand Seiko) makes/made that can actually be considered comparable to something like Omega Co-Axial or like a Rolex 3235 movement? I am looking forward to learning from the collective knowledge this forum has to offer.
 
#3 · (Edited)
When I purchased my MM300 new the AD stated that the movement was equivalent to Rolex accuracy and quality. This set my expectations high. It just isn't near +2/-2 a day. More like -10/+12 depending on how it is worn. Also, the rotor on my 8L35B requires a special tool to remove in order to service it.

The finishing is rather plain and the quality is just not great. I am told I have to send it back to Japan for service at Seiko and can not service it myself. My Rolex movements are far more accurate and have much better finishing. It isn't that the 8L is a bad movement. It is just that it is in no way near a Rolex or Omega in terms of accuracy or finish. My 4R36s are more accurate than my 8L. Maybe my view would be different if I wasn't told it was "just as good as Rolex".

Is it true that the 6306 and 6309 have the same movements?

What is the SD?
 
#5 ·
It's hard to kill a 6139 or 6138, any of it's versions. All this in 1969-70. Vertical clutch, in house and one of the first automatic chronographs. Rolex didn't start using a vertical clutch till the late 90's. If the 6139 was a Swiss watch, it would have the equivalent cost today as any high end Rolex or Omega. Just a lot of elitism involved in Swiss watch prices.
 
#7 · (Edited)
I’m confused by your complaints. What is the price of your MM300, compared to a brand new Rolex or a new Omega with a coaxial movement? Your salesman may have exaggerated a bit, but so what! He’s a salesman. Is Your Seiko a certified chronometer? Is that even possible? A COSC certificate is only available for Swiss made movements. BTW, certified chronometers are guaranteed to be between -4 to plus 6 sec. per day. What does your Instruction manual say about the accuracy you can expect? If it’s less than what Seiko guarantees, send it for warranty service.

Kat


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
#8 ·
TigerUK has an MM300 that runs at something out of this world like 2 seconds or month or something unreal like that.

My 3 x 8L35s are all super solid on the timegrapher for positional variance and daily rate. They are not currently regulated to COSC but that is of little matter to me as they get worn in rotation.

My Rolex 3135 is essentially perfect on the timegrapher in all positions so surely for timekeeping that is better but again the 8L35s just were not set at the factory to positions as are the GS counterparts.

Remember, the 8L35 has MEMS technology and incredible isochronism on a par with Rolex. It is truly a top shelf movement, undecorated by design.
 
#17 ·
I once had a lengthy, wonderful chat with a watchmaker in Louisville. A topic somewhat similar came up, and he made a strong case for the high-beat 4S15 movements in the mid-90s Alpinist and the like. I wish I could specifically recount why, but generally his case is that they were consistently high-performing, robust, and repairable.