Bump. O
Please humour me on this and show me or tell me about the "newest" 7 digit Seiko case back you have, please. :-*
Please humour me on this and show me or tell me about the "newest" 7 digit Seiko case back you have, please. :-*
Sorry i mean a 7 digit serial number instead of the newer 6 digit # they were last used in the late 60s i believe.docrwm said:Ah, you mean the oldest. I was going to post a newer model that went into production 2009 and I have seen a 0 dated caseback for this year (no pic sorry).
I have seen this on Yeoman's weblog - SKZ283 model "Starfish"
TheTigerUK said:Sorry i mean a 7 digit serial number instead of the newer 6 digit # they were last used in the late 60s i believe.
Great stuff Russell but disappointing i thought my January 1969 was the latest one !! :'(Seikozen said:6105-8000=#9705611-rest Dial/Proof Case=====July 1969
Well John i do know that the Belles in general only had 7s in 1966 and 67 then changed too 6.JohnN said:I would be interesting in knowing why there are so many six digit serial numbers prior to 1970. ???
I think from what i can make out the only thing you can be 100% sure about with Seiko is that you can not be 100% sure !!water70proof said:I'm a little suspicious of that 6105 caseback. From what I've seen, everything coming out of Suwa after mid 1968 was six-digit . I've seen several 7-digit serials on 8000/09s to that period (and there have been a few posted here in the past and one on the database). I wonder if that caseback is a service part, but I'm not sure how that would explain the serial number. There were certainly watches that date before the one you've pictured, made at Suwa, that have six-digit numbers. A puzzle.....
paul
Thanks so the June 69 is only a 6 digit ?clarky42 said:Hi all , just looked at my two and they are - 6105-8000 - proof/proof 8508318 - may 1968
6105-8009 - resist / resist 960029 - june 1969
both running strong . :-\