A Russian lines man?Sweephand said:
Cheers,
Axel
A Russian lines man?Sweephand said:hmmm... who won the World Cup that year??? )
Yep, but it seems very rare that the original box has survived - of course that's why it adds valuetime_watcher said:.ALWAYS save the box!!
Whoa Nelly! Axel's gettin' a little crazy. Must be all this football/soccer starting up. ;DAxel66 said:So much cooler than the f... box!
Congrats and a big thanks for sharing!
Cheers,
Axel
The linesman wasn't Russian?nhoJ said:... Axel's gettin' a little crazy....
Hi John - not sure if that was the case with these early autos, but certainly was with the later 8200 Eagle 7 models which have lasted from mid 1979's to now and have been Citizen's standard auto.JohnN said:Fascinating pair of vintage Citizens! Is that "7" designation comparable to what SEIKO did with the "5"?
I seem to recall that the Seiko's '5' related to the watch's functions, day/date etc (can't remember exactly what they are, others will know, or it can be searched for).Time said:great watch! (and box).
Definitely large for its time.
Citizen's 7s and Seiko 5's (and Orient's 3s) are comparable market positioning wise.
Why they each chose an odd number starting from 3 to 7... Now that's a mystery.
Some of these descriptions don't quite fit. I say this because Seiko also made a series of '5' quartz watches which have no mainspring; no Diashock and no automatic winding system.Sweephand said:This is what I've fond for Seiko:
[size=1em]1. Diaflex (unbreakable mainspring)
2. Diashock (Seiko's shock resistant design, equivalent to the Swiss "Incabloc" or "Kif," etc.)
3. Automatic winding
4. Date/date indication
5. Water resistance
There are equivalent things for Citizen, and Orient presumably, but I don't know exactly what makes up the 7 or 3
Sweephand
Not sure - I've not looked at their quartz models in any systematic way. I've seen a 'seven star ' quartz which is not quite the same thing I suppose.Pin said:BTW...do you know if Citizen ever made a '7' quartz?