If it was an original i could at least see some merit. Unless I'm reading the rules incorrectly, it also breaks rule #8 of the contest. The original image used here is not the work of the contestant, it is the work of M.C. Escher with a watch Photoshopped onto the wrist.Hello!! Though the winner “photograph“ is really nice, very original, and probably represented a lot of work for the author, IMHO it has very little of what we generally call a photograph. It is a wonderful computer work/art, but I can not call it a photograph. I find accepting this kind of art and more, prizing it, not fair. Just my opinion . Regards.