Joined
·
5 Posts
The first installment of this sordid story can be found here:
http://www.larrybiggs.net/scwf/index.php?mod=103&action=0&id=1255023567
Well, 9 (nine!) months has passed since then and I haven't got my watch back. It's been in the hands of the watchmaker for more than two full years now. So I think that an update is due.
My problem: in relating my difficulties, shall I give out the guy's name? I said earlier that I didn't want to smear a man's name, but the problem has gone from just silent treatment to what in my book is theft, plain and simple. In January 2010 I got an invoice for the "completed" work, I paid the money, but the watchmaker refused to send me my watch back. For five months all I have gotten is excuses and "the hands need paint" (which was included in the original work order and therefore should have been in the "completed" work) and "going out this week" and - silence.
There isn't too many repair guys that come highly recommended on the SCWF, and with a critical post that don't identify the culprit, they all come under suspicion. Furthermore, members of the SCWF keep reading the walking-on-water praise and they send their watches, just like I did, to a guy that they think is the one to help them.
But he is not.
So: name or no name?
Lars Jakobson
http://www.larrybiggs.net/scwf/index.php?mod=103&action=0&id=1255023567
Well, 9 (nine!) months has passed since then and I haven't got my watch back. It's been in the hands of the watchmaker for more than two full years now. So I think that an update is due.
My problem: in relating my difficulties, shall I give out the guy's name? I said earlier that I didn't want to smear a man's name, but the problem has gone from just silent treatment to what in my book is theft, plain and simple. In January 2010 I got an invoice for the "completed" work, I paid the money, but the watchmaker refused to send me my watch back. For five months all I have gotten is excuses and "the hands need paint" (which was included in the original work order and therefore should have been in the "completed" work) and "going out this week" and - silence.
There isn't too many repair guys that come highly recommended on the SCWF, and with a critical post that don't identify the culprit, they all come under suspicion. Furthermore, members of the SCWF keep reading the walking-on-water praise and they send their watches, just like I did, to a guy that they think is the one to help them.
But he is not.
So: name or no name?
Lars Jakobson