The Watch Site banner
1 - 2 of 2 Posts

· Administrator
Joined
·
34,832 Posts
one simple o-ring on the crown post. You're getting the same WR technology on the $2000 MM300 as you are with a $200 SKX.

Slim the watch down, way too tall and unbalanced like the Rolex DSSD. Chunky bracelet needs an overhaul and the clasp extension is awkward to operate.

I could even argue that the one piece case is irrelevant at this point. They're only eliminating one point of ingress for water intrusion ie. the case back. They are plenty of hyper deep depth rated watches that utilize a traditional case back design.

Get rid of some of the polished case surfaces and use more brushed, too blingy.

Sapphire crystal.

Incorporate a ceramic bezel insert that is easily and relatively inexpensive to replace if necessary.

The movement, dial and hands are all first class.

How's that sound for a re-work? Seiko could execute these changes in 6 months or fewer.
My new grail :):clap::clap::clap::clap:
 

· Administrator
Joined
·
34,832 Posts
i once remember someone talking about the MM and the problem you have if you end up threading the crown....can that issue be easily resolved
I forget who now but dident some one send theres back to Japan for a new tube/case ? expensive if i remember correct.

I believe that some have had a triplock conversion ?
 
1 - 2 of 2 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top