Eco Drive Accuracy Report...

15909 Views 16 Replies 7 Participants Last post by Fastest, Feb 9, 2011

brett kenny

Discussion Starter · Jun 3, 2010

...mostly anyway. After gaining a fair few Citizen Eco Drives during the past year or so, i set them all to atomic time at the beginning of the year and have kept tabs on how they've performed purely for my own amusement.

I thought id share the results with the members here and invite others to let us know how their eco drives have been performing. Maybe we can get a fair idea how these movements perform if we get a large enough database. Obviously all radio controlled models should be excluded from this, (even though two of mine are rc, as im in oz, none receive any signals and thus only operate as standard quartz).

my rate results (all watches except where noted set on 28/1/10):

Citizen AS8009-53E = +4sec/month

Citizen Calibre 2100 = -2sec/month

Citizen Nighthawk = +4sec/month

Citizen World Time = +6sec/month

Citizen BJ2120-07E = +8sec/month

Citizen BN0065-55E = +8sec/month

Citizen JP3040-59E = +3sec/month (digital display)
(battery powered) = -5sec/month (analogue display)

Citizen PMD56-2972 = +/- 0sec/month (measured 2wks only)

Citizen JR3090-58M = +4sec/month

Citizen BL5280-52W = +9sec/month

and as a reference from two others i measured:

Casio EF-524SP-1A = +10sec/month (measured 2 wks only)

Tissot T-Touch = +2sec/month

I hope this was of interest to someone

...surprised?, as expected?, let us know what you guys are getting.
This is my first post here, i see many regulars from other joints ^-^ , pleased to be here, thanks for the invite John, cheers.

See less See more

Save

1 - 7 of 17 Posts

brett kenny

Discussion Starter · #6 · Jun 3, 2010

Sir said:
Those are the sort of figures I'd expect to see, well within Citizen's specs. Since the specs are based on the watch being worn for about 16 hours a day at normal temperatures, you might find the ones running fast will improve their performance if you wear them daily.

One thing that did surprise me was that the digital and analogue on your JP3040 drift apart -- and in opposite directions. Mine stay firmly in sync, as does my other Aquamount and also my Aqualands.

Gday Sir Les,

thats interesting to know about the 16hr wear/day spec on quartz, has that been published by the manufacturers or accepted wisdom based on experience? also interesting to know quartz slow down while worn more, but i guess that'd tie in with your first point mentioned?

regards the 3040, yeah i know, im slightly dissapointed about that to be honest, i thought they act off the same electronics...not sure why they differ but they do. The Tissot synchronises perfectly, ill have to check the skyhawk, forgot to check that one.

cheers

Save

brett kenny

Discussion Starter · #7 · Jun 3, 2010

minidriver said:
The E210 is incredibly accurate IMO and so it was my G910 Minute Repeater.

Welcome to the forum, Brett! ^-^

^-^ Mini!! that sounds more like it

Save

brett kenny

Discussion Starter · #9 · Feb 6, 2011

brett said:
my rate results (all watches except where noted set on 28/1/10):

Citizen AS8009-53E = +4sec/month

Citizen Calibre 2100 = -2sec/month

Citizen Nighthawk = +4sec/month

Citizen World Time = +6sec/month

Citizen BJ2120-07E = +8sec/month

Citizen BN0065-55E = +8sec/month

Citizen JP3040-59E = +3sec/month (digital display)
(battery powered) = -5sec/month (analogue display)

Citizen PMD56-2972 = +/- 0sec/month (measured 2wks only)

Citizen JR3090-58M = +4sec/month

Citizen BL5280-52W = +9sec/month

and as a reference from two others i measured:

Casio EF-524SP-1A = +10sec/month (measured 2 wks only)

Tissot T-Touch = +2sec/month
This is my first post here, i see many regulars from other joints ^-^ , pleased to be here, thanks for the invite John, cheers.

UPDATE @ 28/1/11 (1 year interval):

*note there's a couple new acquisitions so these are measured over time period in brackets

Citizen AS8009-53E = +4.7sec/month

Citizen Calibre 2100 = -1.5sec/month

Citizen Nighthawk = +5.2sec/month

Citizen World Time = +6.8sec/month

Citizen BJ2120-07E = +8.5sec/month

Citizen BN0065-55E = +8.8sec/month

Citizen PMD56-2972 = - 0.9sec/month (9 months)

Citizen JR3090-58M = +5.2sec/month

Citizen BL5280-52W = +9.2sec/month

Citizen BT0070-01A = +8.4sec/month (6 months)

Citizen JR4045-57E = +0.6sec/month (4 months)

Citizen JW0030-55E = +5.75sec/month (3 months)

Citizen AS4020-44B = +0.25sec/month (3 months)

Tissot T-Touch = +1.1sec/month

...more or less not a great deal of deviation compared to when i last measuredin May last year, some results are stellar, most are id say pretty good/ average and all well within spec +/-15sec/month. conditions have been stable (room temp) for 98% of the time as no watch i have gets huge wrist time due to big rotation = max. couple days/ month except the tissot which is my preferred beater.

hope this is of interest to some of you

cheers

See less See more

Save

brett kenny

Discussion Starter · #11 · Feb 6, 2011

SouthPender said:
You have established some good, reliable accuracy values for off-wrist performance. It would be great if you took one watch at a time and wore it for, say, one-two months (perhaps something like 12 hrs. on/12 hrs. off, or better, 14/10) to get its 'wearing' performance. You could use the Stopwatch Method detailed in a sticky on the WUS-HEQ forum, or, if you prefer, just do it by eye.

appreciate the comments SP!

whilst id also be interested to see if the "on wrist" performance improved due to being closer to calibrated temp, i only really have a passing interest in overall accuracy performance and im not sure i could stop the rotation for the length of time it would require to gain any substantive results from any one watch here. also, given none of these watches claim any performance brilliance, im not sure the interest in extending the test on any one of these would be high?

btw, how did your testing with Franks chronomaster and bulova go? im not sure i remember seeing the final results posted? was it abandoned? im more interested in those tbh :57: ;D

Save

brett kenny

Discussion Starter · #13 · Feb 6, 2011

JoseJMartinez said:
Your evaluations are very interesting. I however wonder how you manage to measure the decimal fraction of a second, what kind of calibration apparatus are you utilizing?

probably not required but i used a stopwatch at the end measurements though i only used the eye when i started. given the long interval between measurements, the errors incurred i figured would be minute as a percentage of overall measurements

Save

brett kenny

Discussion Starter · #15 · Feb 8, 2011

SouthPender said:
Well, we got to a 4-week time period with Frank's Bulova Precisionist Claremont model, with the 'on-the-wrist' condition (12/12 or 14/10), and the results were pretty good: +11.32 seconds per year, which, in my opinion, is terrific for a non-thermocompensated watch movement. Rather than continuing with the 'on-the-wrist' condition for a longer period of time, we then went to the 'off-the-wrist' condition, but only got two weeks' worth of data. Over that time period, Frank's Precisionist showed +7.40 seconds per year, but two weeks is too-short a timing period to have much faith in the results. At that point, testing stopped. Still, I think the results that Frank got (and one or two others have as well) suggest that this new 3-prong, high-frequency crystal technology has real promise.

wow, excellent to see that at least the marketing wasnt frivolous. mostly though im surprised that the off wrist performance increased vs on wrist given as you say the manufacturers try to calibrate for on wrist accuracy

cheers

Save

1 - 7 of 17 Posts

This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.

Top Contributors this Month