Forgive me for repeating an old post from another forum, but I never really got a consensus on this. I am not a hobbyist, but used to be a great Seiko fan. I currently wear a Citizen Eco Drive Skyhawk Blue Angels watch and have for several years (5-6). It just keeps going, I love it. The crystal still looks almost pristine after thousands of daily wears.
About 31 years ago I bought my first Seiko watch. It was a A714-5009 digital watch. It had run great all those years but one of my kids when they were small broke the band and some links have gone missing. This is the bracelet that the late Swedefreak fixed for me a few years ago, but shortly afterwards the buttons stuck. I dont blame that watch, that is just aging, i figure. So that was a good one.
Next, a 7434-7008 moon phase watch. Since my wife bought it for me 26 years ago, this watch has had to be fixed twice (always by Seiko) but it never seems to run more than a year or two and needs to be fixed yet again. It has sat in a drawer for many years, but was a beautiful watch. Is there something about that model that made it weak or trouble-prone? It has sentimental value, but just was never reliable enough to wear regularly. That shook my confidence. I am afraid to put more $$$ into having it fixed at Seiko again since they dont provide a long warranty for repairs. I've asked them if that model is particularly trouble prone, but they don't respond. Maybe that is a response.
Then, about 15 years ago or so, I took a chance and bought a 7T32-7C60 chronograph that again I had to have repaired after a 2-3 years. Not long after, it stopped running also. It may be a dead battery but before that the alarm had stopped working. At that time, I was told that it would cost more to repair than I paid for it. That was a watch repair guy at a department store, admittedly.
My conclusion was that Seiko analogs at least were disposable rip-offs. No offense meant to fans here -- I realize who I am writing to.
After that, while shopping for my Skyhawk, I spoke to a jeweler and told him that I had sworn off Seiko (obviously I used to be a big fan) and he was very surprised: he was wearing one that he had had for over 20 years with no trouble. So, I thought it would be worth seeing if maybe it was worth taking a look at them again.
Any thoughts? Was I just unlucky that I bought rare lemon models??? Letters to Seiko only went unanswered except for a repair estimate.
About 31 years ago I bought my first Seiko watch. It was a A714-5009 digital watch. It had run great all those years but one of my kids when they were small broke the band and some links have gone missing. This is the bracelet that the late Swedefreak fixed for me a few years ago, but shortly afterwards the buttons stuck. I dont blame that watch, that is just aging, i figure. So that was a good one.
Next, a 7434-7008 moon phase watch. Since my wife bought it for me 26 years ago, this watch has had to be fixed twice (always by Seiko) but it never seems to run more than a year or two and needs to be fixed yet again. It has sat in a drawer for many years, but was a beautiful watch. Is there something about that model that made it weak or trouble-prone? It has sentimental value, but just was never reliable enough to wear regularly. That shook my confidence. I am afraid to put more $$$ into having it fixed at Seiko again since they dont provide a long warranty for repairs. I've asked them if that model is particularly trouble prone, but they don't respond. Maybe that is a response.
Then, about 15 years ago or so, I took a chance and bought a 7T32-7C60 chronograph that again I had to have repaired after a 2-3 years. Not long after, it stopped running also. It may be a dead battery but before that the alarm had stopped working. At that time, I was told that it would cost more to repair than I paid for it. That was a watch repair guy at a department store, admittedly.
My conclusion was that Seiko analogs at least were disposable rip-offs. No offense meant to fans here -- I realize who I am writing to.
After that, while shopping for my Skyhawk, I spoke to a jeweler and told him that I had sworn off Seiko (obviously I used to be a big fan) and he was very surprised: he was wearing one that he had had for over 20 years with no trouble. So, I thought it would be worth seeing if maybe it was worth taking a look at them again.
Any thoughts? Was I just unlucky that I bought rare lemon models??? Letters to Seiko only went unanswered except for a repair estimate.