|10-05-2019 03:15 AM|
|10-04-2019 10:03 PM|
|10-04-2019 07:56 PM|
|10-04-2019 07:28 PM|
|byscott||The dial looks a little sketchy. Take a close look at the “Seiko” logo in the third picture. The mounting holes for the logo are clearly visible, which seems dubious. Also, the bezel insert has a block at the 60 position, which is incorrect for a watch of this vintage (November 1972). This watch looks like a collection of mismatched parts.|
|10-04-2019 06:44 PM|
|10-04-2019 05:39 PM|
Pogue, is it real?
I dont trust my limited research on this, to feel warm and fuzzy about pulling the trigger, wonder if any experts would help me with my search for a 6139
quick think i noticed was 2nd digit was an N, where i thought it was supposed to be a number of the month not letter for these particular watches in time.
it has since ended but would like to learn the good and the bad with this example to help learn what to look for.