|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||
Topic Review (Newest First)
|
| 08-20-2019 04:46 AM | |
| mahamithra | Thanks guys, waiting for image of case back, watch is represented as unworn. |
| 08-19-2019 06:53 PM | |
| GuyJ | I'd agree that the hands could be relumes to match the dial. Do the glow test and report back? |
| 08-19-2019 06:31 PM | |
| toxicavenger | I have a hard time calling that legit with just one pic. There needs to be more. That dial and hands match way to close patina wise imo. Not a common trait. |
| 08-19-2019 06:12 PM | |
| ramairthree |
Legit. Obviously can’t tell if it has the right caseback and movement, |
| 08-19-2019 12:50 PM | |
| seikozen |
Beautiful Scubapro Nice to see one in such Great Condition. Russell |
| 08-19-2019 12:29 PM | |
| squamish5 | That's the real deal |
| 08-19-2019 11:27 AM | |
| scubarob99 |
Looks legit. Code, font, all other little details look good. Rob |
| 08-19-2019 11:14 AM | |
| Jim W | I’d like to see a clearer closeup of the dial, but from what I can see it looks legit and very nice. |
| 08-19-2019 09:49 AM | |
| RossR | Serial? Caseback? Provenance? |
| 08-19-2019 09:20 AM | |
| DAHASCO |
If I didn't know ant better... Send it my way, I need a new work watch 
|
| 08-19-2019 07:20 AM | |
| DonJ53 | The hands look OK. |
| 08-19-2019 07:18 AM | |
| mahamithra |
Seiko 6306-7001 Scuba Pro 450 Anyone like to comment on this if it is correct or not, please \/ |
