![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
08-19-2019 11:12 AM | ||
borgsauce |
Quote:
|
|
08-19-2019 10:32 AM | ||
bardamu |
Quote:
You never stop to learn ![]() |
|
08-15-2019 09:26 PM | ||
A320 |
Quote:
Attachment 420135 |
|
08-15-2019 08:48 PM | ||
GuyJ |
![]() ![]() |
|
08-15-2019 07:57 PM | ||
borgsauce |
I double checked and I think you're right[emoji20] these are pics from ebay AM bezel. Seems to match. ![]() ![]() |
|
08-15-2019 11:01 AM | ||
Reynaldo |
Quote:
My thoughts as well Dave. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
08-15-2019 10:09 AM | ||
DanFromNewYork | Cool watch! | |
08-14-2019 07:28 AM | ||
zul stapak | Aftermarket bezel | |
08-13-2019 10:23 PM | ||
borgsauce |
I think what we can gather from all this bezel discussion is that the OP has a special and early production 6309 with an uncommon and lesser known bezel. This alone would make it worth holding on to. Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk |
|
08-13-2019 08:47 PM | ||
DAHASCO |
Imagine this: How many lines in the factory produce Rotating Rings ? Are the Machines producing the rings all set the exact same ? Do you really think they were all made at once ? Or Twice ? The watch is original and that is that ![]() |
|
08-13-2019 08:37 PM | ||
Reynaldo |
Quote:
|
|
08-13-2019 07:31 PM | ||
DAHASCO |
Blah, Blah, Blah...The OP's Watch is 100% Seiko factory issued. No replacement parts. Just a wonderful example of Seiko's Best of There Best. ![]() |
|
08-13-2019 07:19 PM | ||
seikozen |
Quote:
|
|
08-13-2019 09:43 AM | ||
GuyJ |
Yeh agreed but we know the crown is incorrect for the date aswell so, bezel likely a replacement later on, too. I thought it was about the authenticity of it. Despite my doubts in the thread I linked I'm of the opinion they are correct...but I mean...if it is fake...well ...![]() |
|
08-13-2019 09:07 AM | ||
DonJ53 | Not 100% true but if I see a bezel with non or few marks and a case with obvious marks (History) I assume it's new to the case. I can't see how a bezel cannot get knocked when the case does. | |
08-13-2019 08:44 AM | ||
GuyJ |
I've had about 30 of these over the years including 3 NOS bezels, one of which was the subject discussed here and one or two 6309s have matched this. Some more pics. ![]() ![]() But believe what you want. For me it's a later production with genuine insert and ring that likely was produced at the time of the 7002 or later, the 7002 ring doesn't fit the 6309/6 afaik.... Vange I'd be happy with the watch and with the large spline crown it'll finish it off nicely. I would say that ring is a later replacement, so not strictly accurate in that sense, however it wouldn't bother me after owning the spare as pictured and handling a few with the same machining. |
|
08-13-2019 07:12 AM | ||
DonJ53 | All my 704#'s bar one, which has a 6105 bezel, have the left version where the undercut cuts fully through the circumferential slots. | |
08-13-2019 06:33 AM | ||
GuyJ |
^^ I may be wrong but that's my understanding! ![]() |
|
08-12-2019 11:16 PM | ||
A320 |
Quote:
|
|
08-12-2019 10:41 PM | ||
GuyJ |
I believe there are two different types of machined edging to these rotating rings and that looks good to me. I can certainly remember one NOS possibly late release of the 86019671 ring with the same pattern And likely a couple of 6309s over the years that looked the same. All looks in keeping. The crown being replaced is one thing that could raise doubts as to the rest but for me I think it is overall very good. Also a 7002 ring wouldn't fit the watch very well, can't remember if too tight or too loose. I tried once and it was one or the other I'm fairly sure. |
|
08-12-2019 10:24 PM | ||
A320 |
Quote:
Attachment 419837 |
|
08-12-2019 09:22 PM | ||
Katgirl |
Very nice. Congrats. Hands appear to be original, based on their condition.. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro |
|
08-12-2019 09:07 PM | ||
A320 |
Quote:
It may sound strange but it gave me some comfort to see the the corroded hands as the chance they were original/OEM improved. This means there would have been some intrusion of moisture/water into the case. The dial seems to have survived and is in very good condition but not sure how the movement has fared. Will leave everything as is but will send off for a full service. |
|
08-12-2019 09:06 PM | ||
borgsauce |
Great fine and congrats! Since the crown was mentioned there is one more thing I thought I should point out. And that's the bezel, not a deal breaker, but just FYI. The bezel might've been replaced at some point as the bezel knurling is different from what I've seen before. The upper row looks abit elongated rather than being boxier. This is something I noticed before on a 7002. But I could be very wrong, maybe someone can chime in on this? Picture below from a 6309-7049 dated 1977. ![]() Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk |
|
08-12-2019 06:41 PM | ||
A320 |
Thanks for everyone's comments. This one came up on a local buy and sell forum by a pawn broker. Everything seemed to check out from the couple of pictures provided so I quickly made an offer and it was wrapped up and on it's way to me within the hour! |
|
This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. |